[nem-bug] [Nemerle 0000595]: too rigid protected member checkign in nested types

[feedback at nemerle.org]

The following issue has been RESOLVED.
======================================================================
<http://nemerle.org/bugs/view.php?id=595> 
======================================================================
Reported By:                malekith
Assigned To:                nazgul
======================================================================
Project:                    Nemerle
Issue ID:                   595
Category:                   Compiler (type engine)
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
======================================================================
Date Submitted:             01-03-2006 17:32 CET
Last Modified:              05-04-2006 22:47 CEST
======================================================================
Summary:                    too rigid protected member checkign in nested types
Description: 
following should compile:

class A {
  protected x : int;
}
class B:A {
  class C {
    public foo(b : B) : void { _ = b.x; }
  }
}

()

======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 nazgul - 05-04-06 22:47 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed on trunk (r6225).

Issue History
Date Modified  Username       Field                    Change              
======================================================================
01-03-06 17:32 malekith       New Issue                                    
05-04-06 22:47 nazgul         Status                   new => resolved     
05-04-06 22:47 nazgul         Resolution               open => fixed       
05-04-06 22:47 nazgul         Assigned To               => nazgul          
05-04-06 22:47 nazgul         Note Added: 0001230                          
======================================================================