[nem-en] recursive types

[Michal Moskal]

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:15:02AM +0200, Wiktor Zychla wrote:
> 
> >Which I think has exactly the same meaning as the error message from the
> >Nemerle compiler. Maybe the wording is somewhat wrong?
> 
> yes it is. thank you.

Is it wrong, or the meaning is the same?

> I hope to put an article on Nemerle on my site in few days. I also plan to 
> talk about Nemerle in my lecture.
> 
> I think I am going to like the language.

That's great!

-- 
: Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith :: GCS !tv h e>+++ b++
: When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson :: UL++++$ C++ E--- a?