[nem-en] Bugs in extension method implementation

[NoiseEHC]

If you want to compile the compiler then simply uninstall nemerle from 
c:\program files\nemerle,
remove nemerle.dll from the assembly cache the build Nemerle.sln from 
the command line.
It will use the \boot compiler and it is working for me...

BTW: can we just get rid off this greedy thing once and for all?

vc wrote:
>    > Indeed, it fails with current boot/ version, but it works correctly
>    > with out.stage3/ before your commit.
>    
>    I not use boot/ncc.exe. I use compiled version of compiler. But I compile
> it using MSBuild (Nemerle.sln).
>    
>    > Well, this is strange, unless you compile using one compiler, but
>    > referencing the other one, like:
>    > boot/ncc.exe  utility.n -r out.stage3/Nemerle.Compiler
>    
>    Probably it occurs because I compile a code from VS 2005.
>    
>    > Could you try again with the version before patch and tell me how
>    > exactly do I reproduce this error?
>    
>    This is compilation log obtained from VS 2005.
>    -----------------------------------------------------
>    Target CoreCompile:
>    C:\Program Files\Nemerle\ncc.exe /no-color /nowarn:1701,1702 /no-stdlib
>    /define:DEBUG;TRACE /debug+ 
>    /out:obj\Debug\Ext2.exe 
>    /target:exe Properties\AssemblyInfo.n Main.n 
>    /ref:"C:\Program Files\Nemerle\Nemerle.Compiler.dll" 
>    /ref:"C:\Program Files\Nemerle\Nemerle.dll" 
>    /ref:C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\System.Data.dll 
>    /ref:C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\System.dll 
>    /ref:C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\System.Xml.dll
>    
>    D:\MyProjects\Tests\Nemerle\Ext2\Ext2\Main.n(5,14,5,28): error : there is
> no member named `GetName' in Nemerle.Compiler.IMember with type ?
>    -----------------------------------------------------
>    C:\Program Files\Nemerle\ contains compilers binaries r6576 (compiled
> from source, not boot).
>    
>    > I don't like the patch, since IsDefined against assembly loaded into
>    > SystemTypeCache is the *correct* (and probably fastest) way  to check
>    > for attributes.
>    
>    In my option ExtensionAttribute not usual attribute. As to speed... I do
> not think, that it will affect performance. Not many of classes containing
> extension methods. Against a background of time of loading of metadata it's
> are nothing.
>    
>    
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>
>
>