[nem-en] Increment and decrement operators

[Michal Moskal]

On 2/26/06, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On the other hand, having ++ behave as expected by many would be very
> nice - maybe we should have a special case for ++ and -- so that they
> will return void in general, but if expected some value, they will
> return it...

This shouldn't be very hard to do, as the warning is issued in T2, it
should be easy to get rid of it. Do you have any patches for +++?

I just wonder if it won't screw up things like:

if (...)
  i++
else
  ()


--
   Michal Moskal,
   http://nemerle.org/~malekith/