[nem-en] Increment and decrement operators
Michal Moskal
michal.moskal at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 09:39:01 CET 2006
On 2/27/06, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> The rule that after } there is implicit ; or , depending on context
> So your ({ x++; x } + {x++; x}) is equivalent to
> ( { x++; x }, + { x++; x })
Now this is ugly... I would call it Revange of Hacks....
Do you think we can do something about it?
--
Michal Moskal,
http://nemerle.org/~malekith/
More information about the devel-en
mailing list