[nem-en] Increment and decrement operators

Michal Moskal michal.moskal at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 09:39:01 CET 2006


On 2/27/06, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> The rule that after } there is implicit ; or , depending on context
> So your ({ x++; x } + {x++; x}) is equivalent to
> ( { x++;  x }, + { x++; x })

Now this is ugly... I would call it Revange of Hacks....

Do you think we can do something about it?

--
   Michal Moskal,
   http://nemerle.org/~malekith/



More information about the devel-en mailing list