[nem-en] Increment and decrement operators

[Kamil Skalski]

Probably we can disable this inside () context, but I'm not sure how
easy would it be.

2006/2/27, Michal Moskal <michal.moskal at gmail.com>:
> On 2/27/06, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The rule that after } there is implicit ; or , depending on context
> > So your ({ x++; x } + {x++; x}) is equivalent to
> > ( { x++;  x }, + { x++; x })
>
> Now this is ugly... I would call it Revange of Hacks....
>
> Do you think we can do something about it?
>
> --
>    Michal Moskal,
>    http://nemerle.org/~malekith/
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>


--
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl