[nem-en] Late Binding in Nemerle

[Kamil Skalski]

Of course it would stay inside some namespace like Nemerle.LateBound
not opened by default. But of course the best operator should be
chosen if any.

2006/7/5, d <d at hell.art.pl>:
>
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Tobias Linsefors wrote:
>
> > !. used as late member operator as I assositate -> with functions
> > as it is used in function types
>
>   I personally don't really care much about his late binding thing,
> but what does make a difference to me is the possibility of poluting
> the syntax with unintuitive operators. IMO it would be better to
> stick with regular macro/function names like "late" and such. "!" and
> similar would only make the code harder to understand (especially for
> newcommers, but regular users as well). Just my opinion, but consider
> how often this feature is going to be used and how confusing the "!"-
> style operators will be.
>
> later,
> d
>
> --
> https://hell.art.pl == terror.org.pl == terror.icm.edu.pl/~d/gpg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>
>
>
>


-- 
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl