[nem-en] [Accessor] & mutable

[Snaury]

On 7/31/06, Sergei Tulentsev <sergei.tulentsev at gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, it does make sense. But, Igor, what are you planning to do?
> Are you gonna show tooltip saying "I advise you to add WantSetter flag here"
> or
> add it yourself? If the latter, then when are you going to do that?
>
> As I can see, the easiest way is to modify Accessor macro itself. :-)

Wouldn't it be a breaking change? What if someone wants a mutable
field (changed internally somewhere inside a class) yet expose only
getter? Suppose that relevant change is made to Accessor macro and
then someone recompiles their code not even aware of such a change and
consequences...