[nem-en] [Accessor] & mutable

[Ivan A Eryshov]

As I understand, Igor doesn't want to make any changes in macro code.
This is proposal about facilities in VS integration. Am I right, Igor?

On 7/31/06, Snaury <snaury at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/31/06, Sergei Tulentsev <sergei.tulentsev at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In my opinion, it does make sense. But, Igor, what are you planning to
> do?
> > Are you gonna show tooltip saying "I advise you to add WantSetter flag
> here"
> > or
> > add it yourself? If the latter, then when are you going to do that?
> >
> > As I can see, the easiest way is to modify Accessor macro itself. :-)
>
> Wouldn't it be a breaking change? What if someone wants a mutable
> field (changed internally somewhere inside a class) yet expose only
> getter? Suppose that relevant change is made to Accessor macro and
> then someone recompiles their code not even aware of such a change and
> consequences...
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/pipermail/devel-en/attachments/20060731/2fcc07ff/attachment.html