[nem-en] [Accessor] & mutable

[Igor Tkachev]

Hello Snaury,

> Wouldn't it be a breaking change? What if someone wants a mutable
> field (changed internally somewhere inside a class) yet expose only
> getter? Suppose that relevant change is made to Accessor macro and
> then someone recompiles their code not even aware of such a change and
> consequences...

In this case someone could use another flag such as DontWantSetter :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                            mailto:it at rsdn.ru