[nem-en] Re: Documentation comments proposals [Very Long]

[Kamil Skalski]

>
> > Of course, so following the $ feature in string literals, it would be
> > $(System.String)
>
> What I am trying to say is the reference should be 'System.String',
> but it should appear as 'string' in documentation. Can we do this?
>

The contents of $ and $(..) will checked against valid names in scope:
parameter names, methods, types. So yes - we can bind them to
"something" (issue warning if it is not posssible) and output some
XML, which would use fullnames/shortcuts as needed. Moreover, probably
the DOC generation tool interprets those names again :)

-- 
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl