[nem-en] expresion level macro to define methods

[Kamil Skalski]

Which version of compiler are you using? If it is with svn, then you
should file a bug report.
As a workaround you shoud be able to use:

def mem_builder =
Nemerle.Macros.ImplicitCTX().CurrentType.DefineAndReturn(a_test);
mem_builder.GetModifiers().AddCustomAttribute (<[ Test ]>);

On 11/17/06, Kamil Dworakowski <kamil.dworakowski at googlemail.com> wrote:
> It works fine except that it ignores attributes I define for my method.
> I want the method to have [Test] attribute, but it gets lost somehow. Why?
>
>  def a_test = <[
>             decl: [Test] public testSth(): void  {
>                 Assert.IsTrue(false);
>             }
>         ]>;
>         Nemerle.Macros.ImplicitCTX().CurrentType.Define(a_test);
>
> Kamil Dworakowski
>
>
> Kamil Skalski wrote:
> > Yes,
> >
> > macro MarkWithMy (expr) {
> >  Nemerle.Macros.ImplicitCTX().CurrentType.Define ( <[ decl:
> >     public MyGeneratedMethod (x : int) : int {
> >         x + $expr
> >     }
> >  ]>);
> >  <[ () ]>
> > }
> >
> > but probably if you tried using this method in compilation of current
> > class/method (for other classes it might be even more indeterministic
> > ;) ), like
> >
> > macro MarkWithMy (expr) {
> >  Nemerle.Macros.ImplicitCTX().CurrentType.Define ( <[ decl:
> >     public MyGeneratedMethod (x : int) : int {
> >         x + $expr
> >     }
> >  ]>);
> >  <[ MyGeneratedMethod(1) ]>
> > }
> >
> > you might get strange problems...
> >
> > On 11/17/06, Kamil Dworakowski <kamil.dworakowski at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> Is it possible for an expresion lvl macro to define a method on the
> >> enclosing class?
> >>
> >> Kamil Dworakowski
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>


-- 
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl