[nem-en] out / ref

[Igor Tkachev]

Hello Ivan,

> Yes, this is more clearly, but I insist that using same syntax
> for absolutely different things - Foo(_) and Foo(out _).
> I'll like this idea if these different things will have different
> syntax. For example Foo(?) and Foo(out _) and vice versa.

Wait a second! What about:

Foo(_ : int) : void
{
  _ = "".Length;

  match(some_list)
  {
    | [1, _]      => ()
    | h :: _ :: t => ()
    | _           => ()
  }
}

All of this is different syntax. And BTW meaning of this is much
closer to Foo(out _) than to Foo(_). Actually, that's the reason why I
thought this syntax will be quite natural and very logical for
Nemerle. 

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                            mailto:it at rsdn.ru