[nem-en] Macros and syntax extensions.

[Kamil Skalski]

I think the best would be the improved $-string, which could take
existing StringBuilder instead of creating new one. Some smart syntax
should be invented for this.

2007/4/30, Sergei Tulentsev <sergei.tulentsev at gmail.com>:
> Hmmm, I don't know for sure (and you don't tell us much :-) ), but what's
> the major difference of your StringTemplate approach vs., let's say,
> $-string? Won't you have to do the same thing with StringBuilders, etc.?
>
>
> On 4/30/07, vc <vc at rsdn.ru> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Why not using sprintf, or $-string? Are there special reasons not to do
> > > that? Or this code was writter before those macros and then nobody
> wanted
> > > to rewrite it?
> >
> > I think for performance reason.
> >
> > The perfect solution for this problem is the "string template".
> > In this time I work on the string template implementation for Nemerle.
> > When I finish we can do refactoring of this code.
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best wishes,
> Sergei Tulentsev
> Senior software engineer.
>
> SITRONICS Telecom Solutions, Moscow
> http://www.sitels.ru
> mob: + 7 916 507 7112
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>
>


-- 
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl