[nem-en] Partial application and functional types

[Ivan A Eryshov]

> On Behalf Of Vladimir Reshetnikov
> 
> Not more ugly, than _.foo(), which is allowed.
> Surely, I could write f => f(2), but I want to save my fingers.

Then we will write: def x = _._(_); and chaos will come ;)
I agree with Vlad, such partial application is pretty tangled.