[nem-en] Const vs. Static non-mutable

[Vladimir Reshetnikov]

For me, it is not so confusing, and it is better then introducing a new keyword.
Note, that in C#, you cannot declare readonly volatile field, so we
may use this combination for our purposes :)

On 2/20/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yap... though this is a little bit confusing (difference between
> volatile and mutable volatile)
>
> 2007/2/20, Vladimir Reshetnikov <v.reshetnikov at gmail.com>:
> > On 2/20/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I would prefer just to control this by "mutable".  Or maybe allow
> > > specifying "volatile" to prevent literalizing the field?
> >
> > Do you mean:
> >
> > class A {
> >   static y : int = 1; // const
> >   static volatile y : int = 1; // static readonly
> >   static mutable y : int; // static mutable
> >   static mutable volatile y : int; // static mutable volatile
> > }
> >
> > ?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
> >
>
>
> --
> Kamil Skalski
> http://nazgul.omega.pl
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>