[nem-en] Const vs. Static non-mutable

Vladimir Reshetnikov v.reshetnikov at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 17:42:01 CET 2007


I agree.

On 2/20/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that current behaviour is a better default. Fields should not
> be inlined only if you explicitly request so.
>
> 2007/2/20, Michal Moskal <michal.moskal at gmail.com>:
> > On 2/20/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yap... though this is a little bit confusing (difference between
> > > volatile and mutable volatile)
> >
> > I would vote for 'const' (but also apply it automatically to static
> > private literal fields as an optimization).
> >
> > --
> >    Michał
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kamil Skalski
> http://nazgul.omega.pl
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>
>


More information about the devel-en mailing list