[nem-en] Const vs. Static non-mutable
Ivan A Eryshov
ivan.eryshov at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 17:54:09 CET 2007
I think this is the best solution.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-en-bounces at nemerle.org [mailto:devel-en-bounces at nemerle.org]
> On Behalf Of Michal Moskal
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:46 PM
> To: devel-en at nemerle.org
> Subject: Re: [nem-en] Const vs. Static non-mutable
>
> On 2/20/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yap... though this is a little bit confusing (difference between
> > volatile and mutable volatile)
>
> I would vote for 'const' (but also apply it automatically to static
> private literal fields as an optimization).
More information about the devel-en
mailing list