[nem-en] macro to define a new kind of member

[Kamil Dworakowski]

Kamil Skalski wrote:
> But you would probably want some nice way to pass those modifiers to
> the macro itself. I don't think that introducing any extra parameters
> in macros just to do this is acceptable. So  modifiers would need to
> travel to macro only inside the Tokens.
I don't quite understand what do you mean by extra parameters to the macro.

These modifiers will have to be made available to the code inside the 
macro somehow. Making it a parameter seems the most obvious way, and, 
indeed, I think of handing them as Tokens.

Kamil Dworakowski