[nem-en] [Proposal] Extend Record or Accesor macro to create PODtypes

[Kamil Skalski]

Right, so maybe MarkWithModifiers ?

2007/1/8, vc <vc at rsdn.ru>:
>
> > I would prefer a separate macro to mark (chosen) members with (any)
> > attribute. It could look like
> >
> > [MarkWithAttribute (Public, Fields, Include = [foo, bar])]
> > class A {
> >   foo : int;
> >   bar : int;
> >   waa : int;
> > }
>
> It's access *modifiers*. "Attribute" very overloaded word.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://nemerle.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-en
>


-- 
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl