[nem-en] [Proposal] Extend Record or Accesor macro to create POD types

[Michal Moskal]

On 1/8/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would prefer a separate macro to mark (chosen) members with (any)
> attribute. It could look like
>
> [MarkWithAttribute (Public, Fields, Include = [foo, bar])]
> class A {
>   foo : int;
>   bar : int;
>   waa : int;
> }
>
> I'm not sure, maybe the "fields" part could be omitted.
>
> Then we could add this attribute also in Record, since "record"
> usually implies that this is plain storage with public fields.

Yes, using it explicitly kind of defeats the point -- seems longer
than writing 'public' everywhere.

-- 
   Michał