[nem-en] Field initializers specification

[Dmitry Ivankov]

On 3/18/07, Kamil Skalski <kamil.skalski at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are right - MaybeAddBaseCall is currently executed before typing
> method, so it will ignore that 'base' calls generated by macros. So I
> think it would be best to replace it with the approach I mentioned
> before - have a flag in Typer, which would detect the presence of
> base() anywhere in the method. So after typing of constructor's body
> it would be known for sure if base call occured or if we should insert
> the default 'base()'
>
It's relatively quick to write, but it'll make typer have unnecessary state.

And if we just tweak DoType to set this flag when it sees base call then
we'll need to tweak some more things (for example if macro gets typer, calls
TypeExpr("base(); ..."), and not inserts that code to body we'll still have
flag set, which is wrong).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /mailman/pipermail/devel-en/attachments/20070318/961c78ba/attachment.html